Viewing a post is an investment of time, so the viewer must be well motivated to proceed beyond the first few lines. Knowing the source provides motivation; lacking that knowledge, a curator helps. In this case, my curator is Claude.ai, as queried below.
Based on the information presented in this thread, please give me a synopsis of the modeling being developed as a basis for understanding physical phenomena on a fundamental level as interactively observed within the world of human experience, if possible in terms of classical mechanics that might be understood by an engineering or similar technically trained professional. Please rate that modeling effort on a scale for internal consistency with respect to classical mechanics and the two established disciplines of general relativity and quantum field theory.
My Query to Claude.ai concerning the above referenced paper
The following roughly two page response from Claude.ai will have to suffice to engage that interest. Claude has given me four style options for answering the request as follows in the links shown. The first four are links to open the PDFs in another tab for printing and large scale viewing.
Normal – Default responses from Claude
Concise – Shorter responses & more messages
Explanatory – Educational responses for learning
Formal – Clear and well-structured responses
The following open in embedded PDF viewers.
Claude responds to questions naturally stated from the information furnished to it by the questioner, on the basis of its internal AI logic and access to resident information, presumably on its LAN and on the web. In this case, it is responding from the perspective of and for someone schooled in classical mechanics, such as a professional engineer, with a request to evaluate my technically modeled understanding of physical phenomena from a paper “Defining a Quantum Gauge on the Inertial Field”. Claude has extracted the data from screen shots submitted in order of each of the 48 pages of the paper, and can differentiate the text, mathematical symbols, and graphic representations within their presented contexts for pertinent data. It compiles, systematically organizes that data in a logical manner, and offers a response based on directions or questions in the query. In this case, the directions and questions are largely limited to the above question.
The above responses are narrowly tailored to evaluate the above referenced paper based solely on its content consistency with classical mechanics. The following query is of broader intent, with respect to possible technological implications, etc., and therefore more speculative.
Given the current state of understanding in physics as represented in the disciplines of general relativity and quantum field theory, how would you rate this paper for its potential to bridge and fill in the gaps between these two established fields of inquiry? Given the author’s lack of standing in the disciplines mentioned, how would you suggest attempting to get a proper vetting of this model based on how you might rate it? What experimental or observational studies might you suggest for further verification of the modeling? What technological applications, such as in cold fusion or capacitive propulsion, might be suggested based on any seminal insights brought to light by this work?
My Query to Claude.ai concerning the above referenced paper
Synopsis with Recommendations for Vetting and Technological Innovation